Description

Complete Solution for below Topics:

APEA Predictor Case Study Discussion: Part 1 – Scabies
APEA Predictor Case Study Discussion: Part 1 – COPD
APEA Predictor Case Study Discussion: Part 1 – Urology

Preparing the Assignment

Follow these guidelines when completing each component of the assignment. Contact your course faculty if you have questions.

Include the Following Sections: 

1. Application of Course Knowledge
   1. Review the results of your APEA predictor Identify the knowledge area in which your score was the lowest.
   2. Create an original case study based on a common chief complaint seen in clients in primary care settings in the body system related to the lowest-scoring knowledge area. Select a chief complaint not already covered in this term’s iHuman case
   3. Case study requirements:
      • Include the chief complaint, demographics, previous medical history (PMHx), previous surgical history (PSHx), allergies, lifestyle, history of present illness (HPI).
      • Analyze associated risk factors/demographics that contribute to the chief complaint and differential diagnoses
      • List three common differential diagnoses for the chief complaint, including pathophysiology and rationale, from the topic area identified on the APEA
      • Discuss how the three differential diagnoses differ from each other in occurrence, pathophysiology, and Your discussion should compare and contrast these diagnoses rather than listing them.
      • Describe relevant testing required to diagnose/evaluate the severity of the three differential diagnoses.
      • Present applicable national guidelines related to diagnosis and diagnostic testing for the differential diagnoses.

2. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations (https://mychamberlain.sharepoint.com/_forms/default.aspx) :
   • Cite a scholarly source in the initial
   • Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response
   • Cite a scholarly source in one peer
   • Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
   • Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per Cite all references and provide references for all citations.
3. Engagement in Meaningful Dialogue: Engage peers and faculty by asking questions, and offering new insights, applications, perspectives, information, or implications for practice.
   • Peer Response: Respond to at least one Substantive posts contribute new, novel perspectives to the discussion using original dialogue (not quotes from sources).
   • Faculty Response: Respond to all questions posed directly to the
   • Communicate using respectful, collegial language and terminology appropriate to advanced nursing practice.
4. Professionalism in Communication: Communicate with minimal errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation.
5. Reference Citation: Use current APA format to format citations and references and is free of
6. Tuesday Participation Requirement: Provide a substantive response to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course faculty (not a response to a peer), by Tuesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
7. Total Participation Requirement: Provide at least three substantive posts (one to the initial question or topic, one to a student peer, and one to a faculty question) on two different days during the week.

**To see view the grading criteria/rubric, please click on the 3 dots in the box at the end of the solid gray bar above the discussion forum title and then Show Rubric.